Proposed Great Topics Fest 3
Peoples' Forum on

install tracking codes

Why host and Live Stream a Forum on Disarmament Terrorism?

It is against the law to kill people, with or without a gun, in America unless it is in self-defense. But it is also against the law to disarm the American people. Do we support and encourage people who call for the murder of people? Then why do some people actually demand disarmament of the whole nation and why do so many others support and encourage those who demand disarmament? Both murder and disarmament are unlawful and the latter more egregious than the first. It is the greatest absurdity in the world that the prevention of one crime should be the commission of another crime, especially, a crime infinitely more detrimental to the whole population!

It is my firm conviction that our nation is witnessing and suffering under what I call "Disarmament Terrorism." Some people have determined that it is easier and faster to achieve disarmament via supposed random shooting sprees and mass shootings than to argue its merits on the floor of the federal and state capitols. And they are correct as there is no good argument for the disarmament of the American people with or without mass shootings. But if mass shootings are poorly investigated coupled with the emotional hysteria created by the mass media cartel, the population can be conditioned to demand congress to do what congress and lobbyists cannot do using logic.

When we define terrorism, and conspiracy, and discover the purpose of the 2nd Amendment and look into the facts about the Freedom From War State department program and the facts surrounding most of the recent mass shootings, the existence of a continuing conspiracy to commit disarmament terrorism is compelling. We also hear endless condemnation of those who seek facts about these mass shootings as "conspiracy theorists." There are thousands of entries on the web asserting that all conspiracy theories are false and discuss how to stop them. If all conspiracy theories are false why is there a voluminous bank of law on conspiracies in American jurisprudence?

And, of course, the main way to stop "conspiracy theories" is to publish crime reports with photos of the crime scene that go into detail and explain all the evidence gathered including the eyewitness accounts and try to resolve them with the facts. But today law enforcement reports are poorly prepared and redacted to the point of being useless. This naturally generates human curiosity and speculation as to what happened. And this natural reaction is called a "conspiracy theory." So who are the real generators of "conspiracy theories?" Is it not government and the mass media cartel?

The 9/11/01 "terror attack on America" was never investigated as a crime and therefore gave rise to mountains of speculation some of which have turned out to be true giving credibility to some of these so-called "conspiracy theories" and logically placing government and the media explanations into the same category, namely, "conspiracy theories." We cannot allow the reduction of all questions of government and the media to mere "anti-government conspiracy theories." Our nation is being locked down into a tyrannical police state.

Why a Pay-Per-View Live-Stream & Archive Rather than A Free Youtube Video Stream and Archive?

None of us alone can have the needed attraction and impact on the people to stop mass shootings and its object, disarmament of the people. None of us alone should pay for the needed expert group impact. This must be a joint effort and it must produce a product that is worth way more than is paid and the proceeds must be shared by the expert participants. But all this means a PPV live-stream that will pay for itself.

Also no one knows how successful any live stream PPV will be and for that reason no one should foot the bill up front without the full acceptance of the risk and loss. But knowing how important this issue is and what will be exposed and learned in this video series, we should all chip in our own efforts and expect to receive the fruits or our labor.

I am amazed that people will baulk at paying $5 to watch an educational video relevant to their survival but yet will pay hundreds of dollars for Las Vegas, boating, golf, camping, and football. If we have been trained to consume distraction and reject substance what can we expect the results to be?

Why Become a Presenter at the People's Forum on Disarmament Terrorism?

It is obvious that none of the government / media plans for a safer society mention the alteration of any of the behavior of government other than increasing its infringement upon the life, liberty and possessions of the people. The real answer lies in the alteration of the behavior of government to restrict those who do the infringing on the property of others including those in government and the media and for government to perform its true duty including preparation of complete and unredacted mass shooting reports.

It is up to the people and those in society that are prepared to defend the people from tyrannical government programs to educate the people so they can stop mass shootings and their objective. Those who have been invited to speak at this forum are knowledgeable of the facts surrounding the creation of the police state, the purpose of the 2nd Amendment, and the disarmament of the American people. I'm sure there are others as well, and feel free to give their names to the host.

Why Now?

The "official experts" cannot explain the recent increase in the frequency and magnitude of mass shootings. No one has ever mentioned that it is against the law to disarm the people much less suggest that this all might be a tyrannical conspiracy to commit disarmament terrorism. But it is our right to consider the possibility that the sudden rise in frequency and magnitude of mass shootings is the result of an effort to achieve the disarmament of the American people. Such complete disarmament of the American people is a US State Department published program, which is tyrannical on its face.

Further, there are two libel cases in point both used to prevent investigation of these events by the public and to protect the mass media cartel from liability when it falsely and purposefully indicates that a citizen is a terrorist. The Pozner v. Fetzer et. al. case protects the government and media from exposure by a citizen. And the Avery v. Baddour et. al. case protects the mass media cartel when it creates false terrorists to justify the police state. There is a double standard in the law for the citizen and the mass media cartel. We should expose and discuss this new tyrannical trend. We now have fake law to protect fake news.

Since we have the State Department program with its stated purpose of total disarmament of the American people and the FEMA Sandy Hook Mass Casualty manual for December 13th and 14th of 2012 we have undeniable evidence of a conspiracy to commit disarmament terrorism between government and the mass media cartel. We know that people are not killed at drills to prevent such things so we can assume that no one died at Sandy Hook on 12/14/12 but that it was pretended that 26 people were killed that day. If Fetzer should not have questioned the legitimacy of the Pozner death certificate, he should not question the FEMA Sandy Hook Mass Casualty Manual for the same day. And if so, how did Adam Lanza get by all the FEMA agents to kill any one including Noah Pozner?

The efforts of honest professionals to find out about what really happened at Sandy Hook have been met with stonewalling, physical threats by police, and groundless lawsuits. The police crime report was sloppy with one very crude floor plan of half a wing all redacted with indiscernible symbols making it unintelligible and therefore no proof of anything other than inept police work or compliant FEMA participants.

Disarmament Terrorism is the use of an unlawful means, mass shootings, to achieve an unlawful goal, disarmament of the American people. It needs to be exposed so the people will be equipped to thwart the goal and hence stop the method to achieve it.

We should advocate legislation that prevents the use of mass shootings to disarm the American people. Such legislation does not alter the law of the land but further enforces it. Mass shootings are not and should not be used as a pretext or excuse to disarm the American people.

If a gunman killed several people and took hostages and demanded the disarmament of the American people, who would be in favor of complying with that demand? Then why are people today demanding the disarmament of the American people when someone else does the shooting and makes no demands or gives other excuses or reasoning for their crimes in questionable "manifestos?" Regardless of who does the shooting and the advocating of the alteration of the law, it is still a conspiracy to disarm the American people. It needs to stop!

Disarmament terrorists would have us believe that all we need to do to stop mass shootings is alter the law and make gun ownership a crime. If it is acceptable to violate one law to prevent violation of another, why not make it lawful to do a mass shooting on the 15th of every month? At least that way we can all prepare for them. The shooters might not be very successful and may die but it would be legal. That is the same faulty logic of those who would demand that we disarm the American people to prevent mass shootings. "Let's make the people vulnerable to attack so they will not be attacked." Where is the logic?

Why James Fetzer and Ron Avery as 2 of the Presenters?

Dr. James Fetzer was found guilty of libel as a matter of law by a summary judgment granted by a Wisconsin judge on June 17, 2019. Any lawyer will tell you it is hard to win a libel case and to win one on a summary judgment is unheard of. There was no jury to determine any facts in the case. Fetzer was researching and publishing information about the FEMA Sandy Hook Mass Casualty Drill that was pretended to be real to the American public. A jury was brought in to hear evidence for damages of the Plaintiff, Leonard Pozner, and they awarded him $450,000 on October 15, 2019. The whole suit revolved around the legitimacy of an incomplete partial death certificate which Fetzer claimed was fake. Regardless of the other evidence that Sandy Hook was a drill, the Pozner Motion for Summary Judgment should have been denied, as no partial death certificate can ever be legitimate. See this whole case online at:

Ron Avery sued Hearst Communication Company, Incorporated for libel for implying on the front page of the Houston Chronicle that he was part of the growing right wing terrorist threat in America. Avery had written evidence of all the 6 elements required to sustain a libel suit. But the Defendant used the faulty Texas Citizen Participation Act unlawfully to have the suit dismissed before it ever got to trial. This suit involved a faulty Act of congress passed by lawyers and the mass media cartel and bad rules of judicial precedent. It is all online at

These two cases prove there is a double standard in court, one for the mass media cartel, and another for the free press of the people. And both of these cases deal with bad law used, and good law misused, to protect fake terrorism created by the mass media cartel to justify the police state and the disarmament of the American people.

Why as Host and Live Streamer?

Avery's brand, MixNstream, is equipped with a system to live stream and immediately archive a pay-per-view mix of computer graphics and multiple cameras to multiple websites including his own. Avery has also hosted many other well known speakers and authors in the past. Avery feels the pressure from his own conscience to host this forum to inform and warn the people of America about the goal and purpose of these mass shootings so the people can prevent their disarmament and protect their life, liberty and possessions. Please help him in this most important endeavor as he cannot do it alone.


Dr. James Fetzer:
Dr. Fetzer earned his Ph.D. in the history and philosophy of science. A former Marine Corps officer, he has published widely on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and evolution and mentality. McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, he has also conducted extensive research into the assassination of JFK, the events of 9/11 and the plane crash that killed Sen. Paul Wellstone. The founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, his latest books include The Place of Probability in Science (with Ellery Eells, 2010) plus And I Suppose we didn't go to the moon, either? (2015), which was his 30th. He has also published more than 30 articles about Sandy Hook.
A Connecticut judge granted a summary judgment against Dr. Fetzer and his co-editor Mike Palecek finding them guilty of libel (defamation) as a matter of law for Fetzer's article concerning a copy of an incomplete death certificate of Noah Pozner given to a third party by Leonard Pozner. Anyone who knows anything about pre-trial procedures will be amazed that Pozner, the plaintiff, even filed a motion for summary judgment much less won it. The Pozner v. Fetzer et. al. lawsuit only addressed the issue of the incomplete death certificate released by Pozner and published by Fetzer. The so-called libelous article was printed in a book entitled Nobody Died at Sandy Hook edited by Fetzer and questioned many things about the death certificate which Fetzer thought were anomalies and concluded that the death certificate was fraudulent. There is no way an incomplete death certificate, the only one Fetzer ever saw prior to trial, can be made lawful by the judge or jury.
And there is no way all six elements of libel could have been proven as a matter of law without the need of any facts or a fact finder (jury) in a pre-trial hearing on a motion for summary judgment. But regardless, there are many more facts about Sandy Hook that make the whole event suspicious, especially when used as justification for disarmament of the American people, a more serious crime than random shootings by crazy people. Dr. Fetzer will surely appeal this erroneous summary judgment.
Regardless of the attempt by Pozner to impose a gag order on Dr. Fetzer with the threat of imprisonment, Dr. Fetzer will be free to discuss all these other strange facts about Sandy Hook, as well as other potential acts of disarmament terrorism in his other books Nobody Died in Boston, either and The Parkland Puzzle, and From Orlando to Dallas and Beyond. Besides, in order to grant a summary judgment, the judge must presume that all the statements of fact and allegations made by the defendant, Dr. Fetzer, are true. That would mean, the judge would have to agree that Sandy Hook was a FEMA exercise that killed no one in order to grant a summary judgment in favor of Pozner. That is how summary judgments work. There must not be any facts in dispute that would prevent a summary judgment. So how can there be a gag order if the judge agrees with Fetzer on all of Fetzer's inferences and allegations of fact?
Rick Wiles:
Rick Wiles is a citizen reporter who decided to take on the Big News Media. Starting with a $7,500 donation in May 1999 to launch the first radio program, Rick's faith in God and steadfast determination has overseen the growth and development of TruNews into an internationally recognized source of credible news and information in a world where nothing seems to make sense anymore. Rick's professional career was in media marketing and advertising sales. Throughout his early years, God's hand silently guided him to be employed in the latest new media. While in his early 20's, Rick's first media job was with a new FM radio station in the days when AM was still king.
In 1980, he blazed a path as a pioneer in local cable television advertising when CNN and ESPN were new start-up channels on cable TV. As a sales manager, he launched one of the first cable advertising interconnects in the nation. He was hired in 1984 by the Christian Broadcasting Network as the first National Cable Marketing Manager for the new CBN Cable Network which later became the Family Channel. In 1995, Paul F. Crouch hired Rick as the Marketing Director for Trinity Broadcasting Network where Rick repositioned the TBN brand inside the cable industry - and played an important role in negotiating the early contracts to launch TBN on DirectTV, DISH, and the former PrimeStar DBS systems. Rick resigned from TBN in September 1998 after receiving a dramatic call from God to full-time ministry.
Rick and his team also covered the fact that there were over 20 eyewitnesses to 3 or 4 shooters who entered the Walmart in El Paso and did the shooting not just one white male.
Edwin Vieira, Jr.:
Edwin Vieira, Jr., holds four degrees from Harvard: A.B. (Harvard College), A.M. and Ph.D. in Chemistry (Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences), and J.D. (Harvard Law School). Dr. Vieira is also the world's foremost authority about the role of our U.S. Constitution as it relates to constitutional national security and safety (Constitutional Homeland Security). His outstanding scholarship and constitutional knowledge with respect to the protections inherent in the people's Militia and Second Amendment powers and rights are very well respected and found in his books Constitutional "Homeland Security" Vol 1 & 2.
Mark Anderson:
Roving Congressional and Bilderberg reporter and editor, Mark Anderson, has returned to Republic Broadcasting Network. Mark formerly was a regular RBN host from 2008 through 2012, usually under the name When Worlds Collide. He also writes for the American Free Press, a national newspaper. And he networks with the UKcolumn in England and 21st Century Wire and Alternate Current Radio.
He is known for his firsthand coverage of the subversive, influential think tanks and institutions that form The Bilderberg Network. He is also the only alternative news reporter who maintains official credentials to periodically cover the U.S. Congress in person.
Also known as The Truth Hound, Mark founded a news association that also goes by the name of STOP THE PRESSES!"
Stewart Rhodes:
Stewart Rhodes founded Oath Keepers in March of 2009 which has around 30,000 members nationwide. He is a Yale Law School graduate and former U.S. Army paratrooper. He also was a staffer for Republican Congressmen Ron Paul. The group consists mainly of former military service men, police and law enforcement personnel. They assist as first responders and security during natural disasters and keepers of the peace at rallies. They also are big defenders of the 1st and 2nd Amendment.
"Oath Keepers reaches out to both current serving and veterans to remind them of their oaths, to teach them more about the Constitution they swore to defend, and to inspire them to defend it..... Oath Keepers also includes a membership program designated as Associate Members, which consists of patriotic citizens who have not served in uniform but who serve now by supporting this mission with their Associate Membership and volunteer activities. Oath Keepers welcomes our Associate Members and appreciates their support of our mission."
Erich Pratt:
Erich Pratt is the Senior Vice President for Gun Owners of America, where he has been employed since 1990. GOA is a national grassroots organization representing more than 1.5 million Americans dedicated to promoting their Second Amendment freedom to keep and bear arms.
GOA lobbies for the pro-gun position in Washington, DC and is involved in firearm issues in the states. GOA's work includes providing legal assistance to those involved in lawsuits with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the federal firearms law enforcement agency.
Pratt has appeared on numerous national radio and TV programs such as NBC's Today Show, MSNBC, CNN, CBS and Fox Cable News. His columns have appeared in newspapers across the country, including USA Today.
In addition to authoring a book, Bearing Arms: Our Rights, Our Duties & Our Freedoms, he is the author of a civil government textbook, The Constitutional Recipe for Freedom.
Pratt has been involved with youth for over two decades, teaching civil government to high school students, serving as a Merit Badge Counselor in the Boy Scouts and coaching Little League baseball teams.
Rachel Malone:
Rachel Malone is the Texas Director for Gun Owners of America, spearheading GOA's work within the Texas Legislature. Rachel is passionate about promoting the right to keep and bear arms in legislation, training, and public perception. In 2012 she founded Texas Firearms Freedom, the first organization to champion constitutional carry in Texas, and has seen tremendous progress through her efforts.
A nationally-certified firearms instructor, Rachel teaches defensive handgun and rifle, finding joy in empowering individuals to protect themselves and their loved ones. She trains and shoots in disciplines from CQB to long-range rifle and participates regularly in Run n Gun biathlons.
You can hear some of Rachel's strong opinions on the Polite Society Podcast. She is also a guest writer for various gun blogs and speaks regularly throughout Texas and beyond on topics including gun rights, legislative action, gun safety, party politics, and more. She remains dedicated to training others in the process by which they can make change happen, safeguarding liberty and justice for all.
Previously, Rachel served as the Operations Director of the Republican Party of Texas, ran a private music studio, and performed as a classical musician. Coming from a long line of proud Texans, she enjoys living on a farm in central Texas.
Carolyn D. Meadows:
An experienced political leader and activist, Meadows was elected to the National Rifle Association Board of Directors in 2003 and is a Benefactor member in the Association. She serves as Vice Chairman of the Public Affairs Committee and Vice President of The NRA Foundation Board of Trustees. She is also a member of the Finance, Legislative Policy, Meeting Site Selection and Executive Committees. Meadows serves as Chairman of the State & Local Affairs Subcommittee. In 2017 she was elected to her current position as NRA Second Vice President.
Mrs. Meadows grew up in a family active in hunting and competitive shooting. She attended Georgia State University and later worked for Lockheed Martin, where she organized hunter and gun safety courses for the employees. Meadows spent time in Australia shortly after drastic gun control measures were enacted there, an experience which drove home for her the pressing need to protect our Second Amendment rights through legislative and social action.
Richard Mack:
Richard Mack, former sheriff of Graham County, is a fifth generation Arizonan. He attended school and grew up in Safford. He excelled in sports and in 1969 was selected to the Arizona Republic High School All-State Football Team. After high school he received a scholarship in music, drama, and football to Eastern Arizona College in Thatcher. He graduated from EAC in 1975 and later received a BA degree from BYU in Latin American Studies and Sociology. He started his career in law enforcement in Provo, Utah and served as communications supervisor, an undercover narcotics agent, school resource officer, youth crimes specialist, corporal, detective, and sergeant. In 1988 he moved home to Graham County and ran for sheriff. He was elected twice.
While serving as sheriff he was the first official in the United States to sue the Clinton Administration to stop the unfunded and unconstitutional Brady Bill. Mack ultimately won a landmark decision at the US Supreme Court on the issue of states' rights. He is the only public official in history to have received the top law enforcement award from the National Rifle Association, Gun Owners of America, and the Second Amendment Foundation. He is the author of several books including: County Sheriff: America's Last Hope, and The Magic of Gun Control.
Chuck Baldwin:
For 8 years (1994-2002), Dr. Baldwin was the host of a lively, hard-hitting radio talk show called Chuck Baldwin Live. This was broadcast locally for 6 years and then was syndicated nationally for 2 years. This show was highly successful in helping to elect conservatives to local, state and national offices. Chuck Baldwin Live was regarded as perhaps the most influential voice in the Florida Panhandle for conservative, constitutional, Christian principles. Chuck's guest list reads like a Who's Who from both the local and national scenes.
Through his radio program Dr. Baldwin has edited and produced The Freedom Documents. This volume contains over fifty of the most important and influential documents of American history. Nowhere else that we know of can you find these great, historic documents under one title. Chuck and his son Tim have also co-authored two books entitled Romans 13: The True Meaning Of Submission and To Keep Or Not To Keep: Why Christians Should Not Give Up Their Guns.
John Whitehead:
John Whitehead is an attorney and author who has written, debated and practiced widely in the area of constitutional law, human rights and popular culture. Whitehead's concern for the persecuted and oppressed led him, in 1982, to establish The Rutherford Institute, a nonprofit civil liberties and human rights organization located in Charlottesville, Virginia. Deeply committed to protecting the constitutional freedoms of every American and the integral human rights of all people, The Rutherford Institute has emerged as a prominent leader in the national dialogue on civil liberties and human rights and a formidable champion of the Constitution. Whitehead serves as the Institute's president and spokesperson.
John Whitehead is a frequent commentator on a variety of legal and cultural issues in the national media and writes a weekly opinion column, which is distributed nationwide. He has authored more than 30 books on various legal and social issues. His most recent books include the best-selling Battlefield America: The War on the American People and the award-winning A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State. In addition, he wrote and directed the documentary video series Grasping for the Wind, as well as its companion book, which focus on key cultural events of the 20th Century. The series received two Silver World Medals at the New York Film and Video Festival.
Kaitlin Bennett:
In May 2018, at age 22, Bennett graduated with a degree in biology from Kent State University in Kent, Ohio. At the university, Bennett founded Liberty Hangout, a media outlet.
In 2017, she was active with Turning Point USA at Kent State before the local chapter folded. In 2018, Bennett open-carried an AR-10 rifle at Kent State University, as a protest in favor of the right of students to be able to carry guns on campus, which they are not allowed to do now, as Kent State forbids students, faculty, and staff from carrying firearms on campus, but not visitors. As a graduate, Bennett was no longer subject to this rule.
Bennett stated that as a student, she should have been able to open-carry for self-defense, citing the 1970 Kent State shootings where Ohio National Guardsmen fired on unarmed students protesting the U.S. bombing of Cambodia. Later that year, Bennett organized an open-carry rally at Kent State. Following her initial protest of Kent State, Bennett became a correspondent for Infowars. Due to her affiliation with Infowars, she was removed from a campaign rally for Bernie Sanders. She was likewise removed from a Pete Buttigieg campaign event for similar reasons. Bennett also interviewed the candidate's same-sex spouse Chasten regarding if "love has no age?" to which he responded he would have to "think about it" and would not answer the question. Around the same time, she was assaulted while filming at a Buttigieg rally and called on the local mayor to condemn the violence.
Bennett has received criticism for her tweets, including one that shared a video of her drinking milk in response to a tweet from PETA claiming that milk was associated with white supremacy, and another that stated that she "loved not living in Mexico".
Ron Avery:
Ron Avery is an architect in the state of Texas and has worked on most every kind of building type for all sizes of architectural firms. While developing property he was sued and spent 7 years in court finally winning a hollow victory. As a result he learned a lot about the judicial process and has been to the Supreme Court of Texas at least 7 times since on issues that covered, defamation (libel), breach of contracts, economic coercion, extortion, conspiracy to interfere with contracts, malicious prosecution, unlawful property taxation, feudalism, unlawful sovereign immunity, the so-called "Texas Citizen Participation Act" and many court decisions and their use.
Avery perceives that we are in the middle of a continuous conspiracy to conduct disarmament terrorism over a long period of time. This criminal scheme has an unlawful purpose and is using an unlawful means to achieve it. He will show a power point on the definitions of conspiracy and terrorism which will expose the nature of this attack.
He will also present a power point on the six elements required to maintain a cause of action for libel and the intentional faulty "Texas Citizens Participation Act." The power points will show how absurd it is for a judge to find Fetzer and Palecek guilty of libel as a matter of law without the finding of any facts. It will also demonstrate how the courts will protect the mass media cartel and destroy those who challenge its fake news revealing a double standard. We now have fake law to protect fake news.
MixNstream is Avery's brand and he is the producer of this event to expose the reality of a conspiracy to conduct disarmament terrorism on the American People. He prays that he is joined by many of these people above to provide sound arguments and present a consensus of thought the America people can rely on and use to confidently shut the mouths of disarmament terrorists and thus render mass shootings useless.
RBN Stop the Presses show on Disarmament Terrorism with Mark Anderson and Ron Avery. Listen to an earlier RBN show on disarmament terrorism and the Pozner v Fetzer et. al. case at: Elements of Libel